What is the expected outcome of post-incident reviews?

• A. Identify root causes and prevent recurrence.
• B. Blame individuals without analysis.
• C. Ignore post-incident lessons.
• D. Terminate the service.

Answer: (A)

Post-incident reviews are about learning from what happened to strengthen the system. The best outcome is identifying the root causes of an incident and putting in place fixes that prevent recurrence. By digging into what happened, when, and why, the team can uncover not only immediate mistakes but also underlying weaknesses in processes, tooling, monitoring, runbooks, and change controls. The result is concrete action items—improved procedures, updated configurations, better automation, or revised escalation paths—owned by someone with a clear deadline. This approach supports a blame-free culture focused on the system and its processes, ensuring that people aren’t singled out and that the organization actually reduces the likelihood of a repeat incident. The other options don’t fit because blaming individuals, ignoring lessons, or terminating the service don’t address the underlying causes or lead to lasting improvements.